Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:48:09 GMT -5
Once again, the inauguration of the judicial year has been used to talk again about the CGPJ, the governing body of the judges, and especially about the right-wing veto of its renewal and the different formulas for its election, rather than giving accounts. to the citizens of their management of the problems and challenges of justice in Spain. It is not going to be that in some powers that are shared with the Ministry of Justice, the reporting and responsibilities are exclusively on the part of the government. The protagonists, the Attorney General of the State and the president of the general council of the judiciary, who have previously been part of more or less notorious governments of the PSOE and the PP, represent a significant example of the extent to which hypocrisy and partiality of some high-profile pronouncements on the independence of justice, when this is predicated exclusively on the independence of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary with respect to the parties and the democratic representation of parliament, when it is part of the Constitution and of the entity that regulates it.
Nothing is said, however, in relation to the independence of the judicial associations, mostly conservative, from their corporate, and therefore also political, character. All of this, from a conception of the parliamentary political election as a professional failure, when however the government of any body, and even more so if it is institutional, is essentially political, as well Australia Phone Number as the appointment and subsequent dedication to the institutional position is stigmatized as transmission belt of political appointment, the same does not occur with that of judicial associations or both, as is currently the case, together with a conception of judicial independence that transcends the exercise of jurisdiction and to which supposed deficiencies, without any evidence in the sentences of the vast majority of the Spanish courts, with the well-known resort to the so-called politicization of justice, particularly in the fight against corruption, despite having very positive results recognized within and outside our country.
But what is not said is that the reviled politicization is at most equivalent if not less than the less commented and therefore even less criticized judicialization of politics, which also exists, outside of any democratic legitimacy and with an evident bias. conservative. Thus, the right's veto of the renewal of the Council , among other democratic institutions, is above all about preserving the large conservative majorities in the government of justice achieved by taking advantage of each period of blockade and especially in moments of extension. We are witnessing the umpteenth debate between democracy and corporatism in the CGPJ election, which according to its representation has a largely conservative bias It also responds to the strategy of delegitimization of the coalition government developed by the Spanish right, since the motion of censure, denying its role as a valid interlocutor in State pacts. The excuses have ranged from the presence of UP and the communists, the appointment of the State Attorney General, criticism of the sentences or the presence among those proposed of some of the most significant anti-corruption judges.
Nothing is said, however, in relation to the independence of the judicial associations, mostly conservative, from their corporate, and therefore also political, character. All of this, from a conception of the parliamentary political election as a professional failure, when however the government of any body, and even more so if it is institutional, is essentially political, as well Australia Phone Number as the appointment and subsequent dedication to the institutional position is stigmatized as transmission belt of political appointment, the same does not occur with that of judicial associations or both, as is currently the case, together with a conception of judicial independence that transcends the exercise of jurisdiction and to which supposed deficiencies, without any evidence in the sentences of the vast majority of the Spanish courts, with the well-known resort to the so-called politicization of justice, particularly in the fight against corruption, despite having very positive results recognized within and outside our country.
But what is not said is that the reviled politicization is at most equivalent if not less than the less commented and therefore even less criticized judicialization of politics, which also exists, outside of any democratic legitimacy and with an evident bias. conservative. Thus, the right's veto of the renewal of the Council , among other democratic institutions, is above all about preserving the large conservative majorities in the government of justice achieved by taking advantage of each period of blockade and especially in moments of extension. We are witnessing the umpteenth debate between democracy and corporatism in the CGPJ election, which according to its representation has a largely conservative bias It also responds to the strategy of delegitimization of the coalition government developed by the Spanish right, since the motion of censure, denying its role as a valid interlocutor in State pacts. The excuses have ranged from the presence of UP and the communists, the appointment of the State Attorney General, criticism of the sentences or the presence among those proposed of some of the most significant anti-corruption judges.